Wife wants full wrap, I want front only, MBZ City drivers, who won?
My wife and I have been arguing about film for a week, and it has become a running joke in our house. We just bought a grey Toyota Highlander, and I want to cover only the front, while she says if we are paying for film at all, we should do the whole car so it looks even. I live near MBZ City, park outside most days and drive on the highway to Abu Dhabi twice a week. Last night I read about some Reliable full or partial PPF options for drivers in MBZ City, and what I took from it is that the bonnet, bumper and mirrors take most of the stone chips and sand, while the roof and rear get much less. That sounded like a point for my side, but my wife says a half job will look strange in a few years. So I would like to hear from people who lived through the same fight at home. If you picked the front only, did the sides ever bother you later? If you went with the full car, was it worth almost double? Does covered paint look different next to uncovered paint after a few summers? Can you add the doors a year later without the film looking mismatched? Another thing is the cost. What did the front package include for you, like the headlights, mirrors and door edges? And how long was the car at the shop? If you settled this at home, please tell me who won, what you paid, and if you would pick the same again. Easy answers help me most, and my marriage might depend on it.